Skip to main content

Thread from the Mueller Report






From page 149 of the Mueller report:

"At approximately 2:40 a.m. on November 9, 2016, news reports stated that candidate Clinton had called President-Elect Trump to concede. [REDACTED] wrote to Dmitriev, 'Putin has won.'

On April 9, 2019, the AP reported:

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday mocked U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Kremlin interference in the 2016 presidential election, saying “a mountain gave birth to a mouse.”

In his first comments since Mueller finished his probe, Putin sought to cast the 22-month investigation as a failure and disregarded the special counsel’s exposure of a Russian operation to put Donald Trump in the White House.

“It was clear for us from the start that it would end like this,” the Russian leader said as the Trump administration and Congress sparred over making Mueller’s still-confidential investigation report public.

Attorney General William Barr wrote in a summary of Mueller’s report that the special counsel found no evidence the Trump campaign “conspired or coordinated” with the Russian government to influence the election.

https://apnews.com/fb38bb654d5f443394d2d4daeeb5bc79

So On 11/9/16, someone from the Trump campaign, likely Eric Prince, called the Russian oligarch Kirill Dmitriev to report "Putin has won."

Three years later, the outlaw AG Billy Barr would lie about the report he is covering up to say it found no connections between Doanld Trump and the Russian government.

Today, the Republican party is leading its followers in a war against truth, justice, and liberty.

Just so you're aware of the context of our times.












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

America Has No King

  America Has No King https://youtube.com/live/NC1D9HGQd-w   F*ck Donald Trump and the Republican judges who can't read the Constitution.    Encoding with OBS AMD HW-AV1 @ 15k bitrate  1440p @ 60 FPS CBR and High Quality; RADEON 7900 XTX

Red Stone Lapis Lazuli s08 e26 - When Ends Justify Means

  Red Stone Lapis Lazuli s08 e26 - When Ends Justify Means https://youtube.com/live/6asoKWVTQLU Recreate two minecart stations and the track. See how Israeli occupation forces used the US humanitarian pier to launch an attack and kill 270 Palestinian people. Compare to Russia's 2002 theater attack where Russia gassed and killed the hostages to save them. Encoding with OBS AMD HW-AV1 @ 15k bitrate 1440p @ 60 FPS CBR and High Quality; RADEON 7900 XTX

Should mail ballots without a postmark delivered after Election Day be counted?

The question is,   Should mail ballots without a postmark delivered after Election Day be counted? The answer is,  Yes. The postmark is the stamp from the post office when they process mail that shows the timestamp of when they began the process of mailing it. The person sending the letter doesn't put postmarks on mail. That means the voter who mails the ballot doesn't actually control if their ballot gets a post mark. That's up to the Post Office and not the voter. Why punish the voter for something the Post Office failed to do? If they're fake ballots, they won't be on the preexisting registry, so they won't be counted and a flag will go up. If there's a janky signature, a phone call will be made to cure the ballot, and all will be made clear. Is the real voter dead? We're gonna find out. Is it a forged signature? We're gonna find out. Did someone forge YOUR signature and voted before you? We're gonna find out. Blaming the voter for the Post Of...