Skip to main content

Suspended from Twitter over the Civil War

Elon finally dropped the ban-hammer on me when my free speech was too much for him to bear. 

During a discussion about the Civil War, Becca Pentland said "They should have been dealt with after the Civil War!".

I replied, "Yes, if the USA would have just hung all the rebel traitor leaders, we wouldn't be in this mess. We should have executed all the confederate heads of state, their traitor president, their traitor generals."

Talking about what the US Government should have done with traitors one hundred and fifty years ago was too much. For this Twitter suspended me.

I appealed, with this:

"Suspended for talking about how USA 150 years ago should have hung the Confederate leaders and generals, to avoid the current situation. It is legal punishment to execute traitors, especially during the Civil War 150 years ago.  Clearly this is not inciting, threatening, glorifying, or expressing a desire for harm or violence. I was talking about an event 150 years ago."

Nevertheless, Twitter found that discussing a 150 year old war violated Twitter TOS. 

It's one thing to be transphobe, a nazi, a white supremacist, a misogynist on Twitter. For Elon Musk, these people are acceptable, as is their content. But if I critically talk about the history of race relations and theory in the USA, Elon Musk kicks me out. 









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

America Has No King

  America Has No King https://youtube.com/live/NC1D9HGQd-w   F*ck Donald Trump and the Republican judges who can't read the Constitution.    Encoding with OBS AMD HW-AV1 @ 15k bitrate  1440p @ 60 FPS CBR and High Quality; RADEON 7900 XTX

Red Stone Lapis Lazuli s08 e26 - When Ends Justify Means

  Red Stone Lapis Lazuli s08 e26 - When Ends Justify Means https://youtube.com/live/6asoKWVTQLU Recreate two minecart stations and the track. See how Israeli occupation forces used the US humanitarian pier to launch an attack and kill 270 Palestinian people. Compare to Russia's 2002 theater attack where Russia gassed and killed the hostages to save them. Encoding with OBS AMD HW-AV1 @ 15k bitrate 1440p @ 60 FPS CBR and High Quality; RADEON 7900 XTX

Should mail ballots without a postmark delivered after Election Day be counted?

The question is,   Should mail ballots without a postmark delivered after Election Day be counted? The answer is,  Yes. The postmark is the stamp from the post office when they process mail that shows the timestamp of when they began the process of mailing it. The person sending the letter doesn't put postmarks on mail. That means the voter who mails the ballot doesn't actually control if their ballot gets a post mark. That's up to the Post Office and not the voter. Why punish the voter for something the Post Office failed to do? If they're fake ballots, they won't be on the preexisting registry, so they won't be counted and a flag will go up. If there's a janky signature, a phone call will be made to cure the ballot, and all will be made clear. Is the real voter dead? We're gonna find out. Is it a forged signature? We're gonna find out. Did someone forge YOUR signature and voted before you? We're gonna find out. Blaming the voter for the Post Of...